Integrations
It has to land in the
system you already run
A tracking update that lives in another tab is not an update. TrackFlo syncs both ways with the TMS your team already works in, so every location, ETA, stop time and POD ends up where your customers, your billing and your reports already look for it.
Transportation management systems
Full two-way sync. Loads and stops come in, tracking updates and PODs go back, and TrackFlo never becomes the system of record.

TMS · Two-way
McLeod
Loads, stops and appointments come in from LoadMaster and PowerBroker. Status updates, ETAs, stop times, notes and PODs are written straight back.
TMS · Two-way
Turvo
Shipments and stops sync both directions, and documents are filed against the order rather than dropped in a folder nobody opens.
TMS · Two-way
Mastery
MasterMind loads flow in; TrackFlo writes status, stop times and trace notes back, and puts the load's TrackFlo link on the route reference.
TMS · Two-way
Revenova
The Salesforce-native TMS. Loads and stops in, tracking updates and PODs out, under the same approval rules as every other integration.

TMS · Two-way
Tai
Webhooks push loads and stops the moment they change. Status updates, stop times, driver details and PODs are written back to Tai.
TMS · Two-way
Quantum Edge
Edge TMS loads, legs, stops and carriers sync on a five-minute cycle, and tracking updates go back the same way.
Other high-value integrations
We are constantly integrating more systems to TrackFlo. Other common integrations we get asked about are:
Shared inbox
Front
Front asks TrackFlo who owns a shipment, so a carrier's email lands with the tracker actually covering that load instead of in a queue.
Telematics link
Samsara
When a carrier shares a Samsara fleet-viewer link, TrackFlo reads it out of the message, keeps it on the load and pushes it into your TMS.
What a sync actually means here
Your TMS stays the system of record
TrackFlo is not a TMS and does not want to be one. It reads your loads, works the tracking on them, and writes the answer back. Turn it off and your TMS is exactly as complete as it was.
Nothing is written without a rule saying so
Every update carries a confidence score and passes your approval rules before it lands. Set the bar high and a human sees it first; set it low and the routine ones post themselves.
A failed write is an alert, not a silence
When your TMS refuses an update or times out, the load says so on the board and somebody is told. The worst outcome for a tracking system is looking correct while a load quietly goes dark.
Running something that isn't on this list?
How long a new TMS takes depends on your API, not our queue: we need to read loads and stops from it and write updates back. Where a platform only reads, or gates its write endpoints, it takes longer.
Asked for most often so far: Aljex, LJX, PCS, QuickManage, SAP TM, Command, BlueShip, and homegrown systems with a REST API. Tell us which one on a demo and you will get a real estimate on the call, including the answer that it is not worth it.
Your version matters as much as the product. Older TMS releases without webhooks are still supported, but the loads arrive by polling every five to ten minutes rather than the moment the TMS changes them. Better to hear that now than in week three.
Keep your TMS. Lose the retyping.
See what a two-way sync does to a tracking team that is currently copying updates by hand.